Syllogistic and non-syllogistic aspects of the comparative argument.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Syllogistic Logic with Comparative Adjectives
This paper adds comparative adjectives to the known systems of syllogistic logic. The comparatives are interpreted by transitive and irreflexive relations. The main point is to obtain sound and complete axiomatizations of the logics.
متن کاملThe propositional and relational syllogistic∗
In this paper it is shown how syllogistic reasoning can be extended to account for propositional logic and relations.
متن کاملThe Hamiltonian Syllogistic
This paper undertakes a re-examination of Sir William Hamilton’s doctrine of the quantification of the predicate. Hamilton’s doctrine comprises two theses. First, the predicates of traditional syllogistic sentence-forms contain implicit existential quantifiers, so that, for example, All p are q is to be understood as All p are some q. Second, these implicit quantifiers can be meaningfully duali...
متن کاملThe Syllogistic with Unity
We extend the language of the classical syllogisms with the sentenceforms “At most 1 p is a q” and “More than 1 p is a q”. We show that the resulting logic does not admit a finite set of syllogism-like rules whose associated derivation relation is sound and complete, even when reductio ad absurdum is allowed.
متن کاملThe Fuzzy Syllogistic System
A categorical syllogism is a rule of inference, consisting of two premisses and one conclusion. Every premiss and conclusion consists of dual relationships between the objects M, P, S. Logicians usually use only true syllogisms for deductive reasoning. After predicate logic had superseded syllogisms in the 19th century, interest on the syllogistic system vanished. We have analysed the syllogist...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
سال: 1970
ISSN: 0029-4527
DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1093893857